What does it mean to be a “good” student according to the commonsense?
Societies pressure teachers to produce obedient and mild-mannered students. Students who are able to follow instruction and talk quietly and orderly are praised, while students who may think too critically and challenge norms are seen as disruptive and are scolded. In this way, what students learn and how students learn can actually oppress them.
Which students are privileged by this definition of the good student?
The students who are privileged by this definition are the docile ones. The students may be smart, quiet, and able to follow instructions, but not being able to think critically will not help these students in the real world. These docile student will be “participatory citizens”, meaning they will be ‘charitable’ and donate to a food drive. But we should expect more from our students and have them expect more from themselves. Rather than just donating to a food drive, students should investigate root causes of hunger in their communities and seek to rectify that. Or at the very least, be a leader in the community and organize the food drive themselves.
A good article about the type of citizens we want students to be can be found here.
What is made impossible to see/understand/believe because of these commonsense ideas?
Challenging the oppression of critical thinking students is more than just recognizing its existence. More important is being able to address the issue on a broader, more social context. Challenging this oppression in your own classroom is great, but making students aware of it themselves, and working through challenging it together is even better.